상담완료 | Sadie님의 문의
페이지 정보
작성자 Sadie 작성일24-05-18 04:19 조회27회 댓글0건관련링크
본문
이름 : Sadie
이메일 : sadieeberly@cox.net 연락처 : 예식일 : 'They are not robots': AFL umpire dissent rears its ugly head again 문의내용: fans and pundits have slammed the decision by umpires to give Collingwood star Jordan De Goey a 50-metre penalty for dissent on Friday night, despite the star's attempts to stifle his frustration.
With the game on the line and the Pies trying to mount a comeback, De Goey drew a whistle for a push in the back that looked like a legitimate tackle.
De Goey reactively threw his hands out in frustration, but then quickly drew them back in as he consciously realised that action is now classed as dissent.
A new round of footy, another controversial dis Despite reeling his appeal in, De Goey still copped a 50-metre penalty that was hugely influential in the context of the match.
Both De Goey and Bulldogs player Buku Khamis conceded controversial 50-metre penalties in the match and Matthew Richardson was scathing in commentary.
'Come off it. That's not 50 metres,' he said in commentary for Seven.
'You have to pay them all then. It's just ridiculous.
'I feel for them at times. This is an emotional game. They are not robots.'
![]()
De Goey was left confused and frustated by the series of calls against him. It could easily have gone the other way, with the tackle leading to a Collingwood free kick instead
Speaking on , former champion full-forward Jason Dunstall said there should be leniency with incidents like De Goey, where he realised he had reacted in violation of the rules and tried to quickly put his arms back down.
'I thought De Goey in particular was a little bit stiff because he was about to go off and then literally harnessed himself back in and then actually stopped but you could see initially he was about to throw the arms up,' Dunstall said.
'If you are going to make that much of an effort to pull yourself back, I think you're entitled to get a little bit of latitude.
'This is where it is really, really difficult.'
I'm all for protecting umpires etc but I'm not a fan of the 50m ‘dissent' rule. There's a difference between abuse and frustration. Neither last night were. By all means penalise them for real dissent, not this minor stuff,' Graham Howlett tweeted.
'There is a difference between decent and frustration! Decent should be paid, frustration or emotion in the heat of battle is completely different and should not be removed from the game, before they turn all the players into robots,' Neville Clark agre A Twitter pundit named Steve said the calls were impacting the spectacle of games: 'Both last night were shockers. AFL need to have a hard look at some of these rules, going to drive away fans. That De Goey one absolutely killed the vibe of the game last night. Crowd lost interest,' he tweeted.
A Twitter pundit named Steve said the calls were impacting the spectacle of games: 'Both last night were shockers. AFL need to have a hard look at some of these rules, going to drive away fans. That De Goey one absolutely killed the vibe of the game last night. Crowd lost interest,' he tweeted.
It's an absolute joke. He's just kicked the pies 3rd goal in a row. Working his guts out for a potential comeback. Disputes the decision for a split second. You'd be disappointed if he wasn't emotional. Brad Scott - have a look at what you're doing to the game
— Michail Varnis (@m_varnis) 'AFL umpiring has become [a] joke! How is that umpire abuse? Don't defend the indefensible Brad Scott accept that you got it wrong and rectify it,' Kevin Baker tweeted.
'It is a big mess, take the abuse out I'm all for that. But this showing any type of emotion, it's become a three ring circus. How on earth would of Brad Scott played in his day, as he was a very emotional player?' Tracey Reid asked.
Everyone: "No one could do a better job of trying to destroy the game than Steve Hocking."
Brad Scott: "Hold my beer."
— Ricky Power (@ricky_t_power) Dunstall warned that it was important for fans and players to not blame the umpires, as they were just under instruction from the AFL.
'They're giving instructions to the umpires so let's not be hard on them either. If you see the arms go up, that is some form of dissent but it's hard to expect players to completely turn off the emotion as soon as the whistle goes,' he said.
data-track-module="am-external-links^external-links">
Read more:
이메일 : sadieeberly@cox.net 연락처 : 예식일 : 'They are not robots': AFL umpire dissent rears its ugly head again 문의내용: fans and pundits have slammed the decision by umpires to give Collingwood star Jordan De Goey a 50-metre penalty for dissent on Friday night, despite the star's attempts to stifle his frustration.
With the game on the line and the Pies trying to mount a comeback, De Goey drew a whistle for a push in the back that looked like a legitimate tackle.
De Goey reactively threw his hands out in frustration, but then quickly drew them back in as he consciously realised that action is now classed as dissent.
A new round of footy, another controversial dis Despite reeling his appeal in, De Goey still copped a 50-metre penalty that was hugely influential in the context of the match.
Both De Goey and Bulldogs player Buku Khamis conceded controversial 50-metre penalties in the match and Matthew Richardson was scathing in commentary.
'Come off it. That's not 50 metres,' he said in commentary for Seven.
'You have to pay them all then. It's just ridiculous.
'I feel for them at times. This is an emotional game. They are not robots.'
Speaking on , former champion full-forward Jason Dunstall said there should be leniency with incidents like De Goey, where he realised he had reacted in violation of the rules and tried to quickly put his arms back down.
'I thought De Goey in particular was a little bit stiff because he was about to go off and then literally harnessed himself back in and then actually stopped but you could see initially he was about to throw the arms up,' Dunstall said.
'If you are going to make that much of an effort to pull yourself back, I think you're entitled to get a little bit of latitude.
'This is where it is really, really difficult.'
I'm all for protecting umpires etc but I'm not a fan of the 50m ‘dissent' rule. There's a difference between abuse and frustration. Neither last night were. By all means penalise them for real dissent, not this minor stuff,' Graham Howlett tweeted.
'There is a difference between decent and frustration! Decent should be paid, frustration or emotion in the heat of battle is completely different and should not be removed from the game, before they turn all the players into robots,' Neville Clark agre A Twitter pundit named Steve said the calls were impacting the spectacle of games: 'Both last night were shockers. AFL need to have a hard look at some of these rules, going to drive away fans. That De Goey one absolutely killed the vibe of the game last night. Crowd lost interest,' he tweeted.
A Twitter pundit named Steve said the calls were impacting the spectacle of games: 'Both last night were shockers. AFL need to have a hard look at some of these rules, going to drive away fans. That De Goey one absolutely killed the vibe of the game last night. Crowd lost interest,' he tweeted.
It's an absolute joke. He's just kicked the pies 3rd goal in a row. Working his guts out for a potential comeback. Disputes the decision for a split second. You'd be disappointed if he wasn't emotional. Brad Scott - have a look at what you're doing to the game
— Michail Varnis (@m_varnis) 'AFL umpiring has become [a] joke! How is that umpire abuse? Don't defend the indefensible Brad Scott accept that you got it wrong and rectify it,' Kevin Baker tweeted.
'It is a big mess, take the abuse out I'm all for that. But this showing any type of emotion, it's become a three ring circus. How on earth would of Brad Scott played in his day, as he was a very emotional player?' Tracey Reid asked.
Everyone: "No one could do a better job of trying to destroy the game than Steve Hocking."
Brad Scott: "Hold my beer."
— Ricky Power (@ricky_t_power) Dunstall warned that it was important for fans and players to not blame the umpires, as they were just under instruction from the AFL.
'They're giving instructions to the umpires so let's not be hard on them either. If you see the arms go up, that is some form of dissent but it's hard to expect players to completely turn off the emotion as soon as the whistle goes,' he said.
data-track-module="am-external-links^external-links">
Read more:
댓글목록
등록된 댓글이 없습니다.
